Mangaiyarkarasi Manoharan’s Kiddofin treats money as a behaviour to be rehearsed, using games, simulations and role-play for children and teenagers.

Financial trouble in adulthood rarely starts with a loan. It starts years earlier, in a childhood where money was everywhere and explained almost nowhere. Children overhear talk of school fees, gold and EMIs. They watch a parent compare prices and see an advertisement promise urgency. Formal lessons arrive much later.

That gap is where Kiddofin operates. Founded by Mangaiyarkarasi Manoharan under TuskerRayz Consultation Services (OPC) Pvt. Ltd., it is an experiential initiative built around financial literacy for kids and teenagers. Its pitch is simple: a child who can recite the compound interest formula may still grow into an adult who cannot stop impulse buying. Kiddofin aims at capability, meaning the ability to act well with money, instead of knowledge alone.

From bank branches to classrooms

Manoharan’s background gives the model its shape. She holds the CAIIB qualification and has held the Chartered Banker designation in the United Kingdom. She also has a Diploma in Training and Development from the Indian Society for Training & Development (ISTD), plus qualifications in technology, management, information systems and cybersecurity. Her career ran through treasury, branch banking, credit, compliance and operations.

That vantage point showed her two versions of finance. Inside a bank, money moves through products, regulations and risk frameworks. Inside a household, it moves through aspiration, fear, family expectation and social comparison. Running financial-literacy programmes for students, she kept returning to one question: what if these conversations started earlier?

Idea 1: Teach the psychology before the arithmetic

Most children’s money programmes begin with saving. Kiddofin begins with the reasons children want things. A toy becomes desirable because a friend owns it. A limited-time offer manufactures urgency. A creator makes a product look essential. A tap on a phone removes the feel of handing over cash, and a small subscription looks harmless in isolation.

The curriculum therefore covers delayed gratification, emotional spending, peer influence, marketing psychology, opportunity cost and the difference between needs and wants. The aim is not to make children nervous about every purchase. It is to help them spot what is steering a decision. A capable young spender should eventually ask “Why do I want this?” and “Would I still want it tomorrow?” before asking “Can I afford this?”

Idea 2: Let children experience compounding

Kiddofin describes itself as a financial laboratory, and the comparison with science class is deliberate. Nobody learns chemistry only by memorising reactions, so Manoharan argues financial education needs experiments too.

Take compounding. In a simulation, two children start with similar resources. One spends everything at once. The other holds back a portion and lets it grow across several rounds. Nobody has to tell the class that patience has a price tag, because the results pile up on the table. Waiting stops feeling like deprivation and starts to look like a strategy.

The toolkit includes board games, shopping simulations, mock markets, banking role-play, entrepreneurship games and digital-safety scenarios. In one, a learner must respond to a suspicious message before seeing what the decision cost. A twelve-year-old can make a bad call, work out why it failed and play another round, with no real money lost.

Engagement is part of the design. Children negotiate, debate and challenge each other’s choices. When a student asks for another round, or goes home to question a parent about a household money habit, Manoharan reads that as evidence the method works.

Idea 3: Train the person holding the game

A good curriculum can still fail in the wrong hands. Teaching a ten-year-old takes different skills from briefing an adult investor, including questioning technique, storytelling and classroom management. Drawing on her ISTD training, Manoharan is building a model where educators are prepared to facilitate experiential sessions rather than deliver slides. For anyone studying how to scale financial literacy for kids, this is the detail that matters most: the programme needs facilitators who can make children think, and those people have to be trained.

Kiddofin currently works with schools and also runs workshops in residential communities, where siblings can join in and the conversation carries home.

Idea 4: Build for Indian and NRI families

The company is also shaping its content for Indian and NRI children in markets such as the United States, the UAE, Singapore, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia. Systems differ by country, but the behavioural questions travel well: how to tell a need from a want, why borrowing helps in some cases and hurts in others, how to respond to fraud.

NRI children present a particular opening. Many hear family conversations in rupees while spending in dollars, dirhams or riyals. Kiddofin wants to give them financial thinking that adapts across currencies while staying familiar to Indian households.

Idea 5: Start from the family

Two early-stage efforts sit at the edge of the core programme. The first is inclusive-learning R&D, which explores visual, tactile and adaptive formats for children with different learning needs or physical disabilities, with accessibility considered at the design stage.

The second is a community concept called “Namma Family, Namma Finance.” Girls and their mothers learn together, and participants who do well are prepared as financial-literacy ambassadors in their own neighbourhoods. The longer-term plan includes reaching families connected to government schools through institutional and community partnerships. A lesson delivered to one child can then reach a whole household.

The larger argument

Manoharan frames money as a question of freedom. Financial insecurity touches nearly every rung of Maslow’s hierarchy, and heavy commitments can shut the door on a career change or a startup. She points to the sentence many adults eventually say: “I cannot take the risk because I have an EMI.” Early capability will not remove such constraints, but it can leave a person with more options.

There is a paradox in her pitch too. The goal is not children who think about money constantly. It is young people who understand it well enough that it stops running their lives.

Why this matters for founders and investors

Children today grow up with one-click payments, in-game purchases, instant credit and personalised advertising. Demand for financial literacy for kids is likely to grow as these habits form earlier. Kiddofin’s bet combines a proven format (games and simulations), a differentiator (behavioural finance plus facilitator training) and several expansion paths: schools, residential communities, NRI families and community outreach. The company has not shared traction numbers, so its commercial scale is still to be shown. Its thesis, though, is coherent and sits in a field where credible founders with a banking background are rare. For the wider education-technology community, it is a case study in teaching a life skill through practice instead of lecture.

Manoharan’s own summary is that financial education may need to start years before the first salary, when a child makes a small choice and watches what follows.

Sources: Founder feature and company materials provided by Kiddofin (kiddofin.org). For national context on financial education in India, see the National Centre for Financial Education.

Related : https://launch91.com/startups/iit-madras-unicorn-india-ventures-deeptech-fund-i-first-close-450-cror/